Showing posts with label Reloading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reloading. Show all posts

Thursday, October 08, 2015

.327 Federal in the Single-Seven

Last year I bought a Lipsey's Special, Single-Seven Ruger in .327 Federal. This 7-shot gun is based on the frame of Ruger's long popular Single-Six .22 rimfire. The cylinder window dimensions have been slightly enlarged and the cylinder dimensions likewise increased to fill the window which permits the chambering of 7 of the .32 caliber cartridges and handling the pressures those cartridges will generate.

Factory ammunition available since my purchase has been limited to the Federal American Eagle loaded with 85 and 100 grain soft-nosed bullets. While these two bullets are of different weight, the design for both seems to be the same and one can't tell the difference by simply looking at a loaded cartridge. This hasn't proven to be as accurate as I think the pistol should be and so I decided to load a known quality bullet, the Hornady 100 gr. XTP.

BulletPowderPowder ChargeMuzzle VelocityMuzzle Energy
Hornady 100 gr. XTPAA-79.4 gr.1462 fpsMuzzle Energy
Hornady 100 gr. XTPAA-913.0 gr.1572 fpsMuzzle Energy
Hornady 100 gr. XTP240011.5 gr.1405 fpsMuzzle Energy
Hornady 100 gr. XTPH11013.5 gr.1525 fpsMuzzle Energy
Hornady 100 gr. XTPLongshot6.7 gr.1402 fpsMuzzle Energy


However, the gun wasn't shooting well and so I sent it back to Ruger who did some work and returned it within a week. This first is the test target they sent with the invoice. They shot this test at 15-yards.

Today, I shot the gun with the Federal factory 100-grain bullet load. This is what 3 cylinders full looks like after being shot at 25-yards.
 
I also shot some of my reload of the 100-grain XTP over 9.4-grains of AA-7. This is that target.


Needless to say I was not happy. Is my eyesight to blame? Can I not shoot today? Poor trigger management? Had it with me so I got out my Garthwaite CCO and 5 magazines (6-7 rounds each) of mixed brand "white-box" ball. This is that target.

So, I think I can still shoot alright but the gun is just not going to group worth a fig. I did not want a cast bullet gun and I suspect it will be a pain to find a mold to cast a bullet big enough in diameter to work with the cylinder and bore.

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Adventures in reloading...

I had a bit of an oddity while reloading today. I've been working on loads for my M1 rifle and settled on 48 gr. 4064 with the 150 gr. Sierra Matchking. Since my old Lee Autoprime was getting a bit loose (the cover which would sometimes work loose) I thought I'd try a new one. The new Autoprime has a two stage system to separate the primers you are seating from those in the "magazine" and it takes out some of the feel. Also, in my load search I sought to compare to a widely known quantity, the Hornady 168 gr. AMAX load. All this came together today when I went to charge one of the Hornady cases as I picked up the primed case to pour in the powder charge I noticed that the primer was falling out! Although I had this happen once with a many times fired case about 30 years ago I have never had this happen with a once fired case. None of the other 39 cases had a loose primer pocket and I didn't notice this when removing the fired primers and I think, emphasis on think, that I didn't notice the lack of resistance when priming due to the built in multiple stages of the Autoprime.

About that new Autoprime... The primer "magazine" cover has come loose twice or rather it was pushed off by the first stage primer lifter catching the primer on the cover and pushing it off. There is some slop there and it bugs me. I guess Lee had to do something because somewhere, somehow, somebody managed to set off a primer while priming and thence the whole lot in the "magazine" yet this system doesn't thrill me. I'm thinking of buying an RCBS hand primer.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Reloading supplies...

I feel very fortunate today to be able to buy 8 lbs of Reddot and 4 lbs of Bullseye for $14.71 a pound. 12 lbs of powder, powder which will go a long way in pistol or certain rifle cartridges, for $171.26. What a deal! Many thanks to Bill M______ of The Stonewall Rifle and Pistol Club for helping out fellow club members on this club buy. Bill puts in a lot of hours working for the club.

Saturday, November 01, 2014

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Reloading projects continuing...

First thing for this fall/winter's reloading projects I loaded 500 .380/200 rounds. Now I'll be able to enjoy my Webley MKIV with the correct period ammo.

Second project was to load about 1000 .32 WCF cases. They are all primed now and turns out that there are 910. These should all fit in a .30 Cal ammo can and will keep the 1894CL hunting for a long time to come.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Shell Holder Cross Reference

I often have need for this.

CaliberLeeRCBSLymanHornady
10 mm192715n/a
11 mm Mausern/a22n/an/a
17 Remington4102616
218 Bee61n/a7
219 Zipper3n/an/a2
22 BR2n/an/an/a
22 Hornet71243
22 Hornet201243
22 K Hornet712n/a3
22 K Hornet2012n/a3
22 Remington Jet16n/a6
22 Savage32n/an/a
22/2502321
220 Swift101154
221 Fireball4102616
222 Remington4102616
222 Remington Magnum4102616
223 (5.56 mm)4102616
224 Clark (22/257)2n/an/an/a
225 Winchester10n/an/a18
240 Weatherby23n/an/a
243 Winchester2321
244 Remington2321
25 ACP15293237
25/062321
25/20 Winchester61107
25/2842n/an/an/a
25/3532n/an/a
250 Savage2321
256 Winchester Magnum1n/an/a6
257 Roberts2321
257 Roberts Improved23n/an/a
257 Weatherby54n/a5
260 Remingtonn/a32n/a
264 Winchester Magnum54n/a5
270 Weatherby54n/a5
270 Win S Mag54334n/a
270 Winchester2321
280 Remington232n/a
284 Winchester23n/a1
30 BR2n/an/an/a
30 Herrett3n/an/an/a
30 Luger191128
30 Luger61128
30 M 1 Carbine7171922
30 Mauser6112n/a
30 Mauser19112n/a
30 Remingtonn/a19n/an/a
30-338 Win Magn/a4n/an/a
30-378 Weatherby Magn/a14n/an/a
30-40 Krag57n/an/a
30/06 Springfield2321
30/30 Winchester(30 W.C.F.)3262
30/40 Krag (30 U.S.)5n/an/a11
300 H&H54n/a5
300 Rem Short Ultra Magn/a3813n/a
300 Remington Ultra Magn/an/a13n/a
300 Savage2321
300 Ultra Magnum538n/an/a
300 Weatherby54135
300 Win Short Magnum54334n/a
300 Winchester Magnum54135
303 British577n/a
303 Savagen/a21n/a33
303/255n/an/an/a
307 Winchester3n/a6n/a
307 Winchestern/a26n/a
308 Norma Magnum54n/an/a
308 Winchester(7.62 NATO)2321
32 ACP [Auto7172322
32 ACP [Universal ]7B172322
32 Colt N.P.4n/an/an/a
32 H&R Magn/a239n/a
32 Long Colt4n/an/an/a
32 S&W4n/an/a36
32 S&W Long423936
32 Short Colt4n/an/an/a
32 Winchester Special3262
32 WinchesterS.L.3n/an/an/a
32-40 WCF32n/an/a
32/20 (32 W.C.F.)6110n/a
32/40 Winchester32n/an/a
33 Winchester8n/an/an/a
338 – 06n/a3n/an/a
338 Laupan/a14n/an/a
338 Remington Ultra Magn/an/a13n/a
338 Ultra Magnum538n/an/a
338 Win Short Magn/a43n/an/a
338 Winchester Magnum54135
340 Weatherby54n/a5
348 Winchester85n/a25
35 Remington29226
35 Whelan232n/a
35 Winchester5n/an/an/a
350 Remington Magnum54n/a5
356 TSWn/a1n/an/a
356 Winchester326n/a
357 Auto Magnum2n/an/an/a
357 Magnum1616
357 Maximum1616
358 Norma Magnum5n/an/an/a
358 Winchester2321
375 H&H54135
375 Rem Ultra Mag53813n/a
375 Weatherby5n/an/an/a
375 Winchester326n/a
376 Styer1142n/an/a
378 Weatherby Magn/a14n/an/a
38 ACP19n/an/an/a
38 ACP6n/an/an/a
38 Casulln/a3n/an/a
38 Colt N.P.1n/an/an/a
38 Long Colt1n/an/an/a
38 S&W162128
38 Short Colt1n/an/an/a
38 Special1616
38 Super Auto639128
38 Super Auto193912n/a
38/40 Winchester1435n/an/a
38/55 Winchester3262
380 Auto4102616
40 S&W192715n/a
40-65 Sharpsn/a1417n/a
40-70 Sharps Straightn/an/a33n/a
40/82 Winchester8n/an/an/a
400 Corbonn/a3n/an/a
404 Jefferyn/a41n/an/a
405 Winchestern/a24n/an/a
408 Winchester3n/an/an/a
41 Action Express6n/an/an/a
41 Action Express19n/an/an/a
41 Long Colt1n/an/an/a
41 Magnum9303029
416 Remington54n/an/a
416 Rigby83717n/a
43 Mauser18n/an/an/a
43 Spanish1722n/an/a
43 Spanish17n/an/an/a
44 Auto Magnum2n/an/an/a
44 Magnum1118730
44 S&W Russian1118n/an/a
44 S&W Special1118730
44/40143514Bn/a
444 Marlin112814B27
45 Auto (ACP)2321
45 Auto Rim138n/an/a
45 Colt14201132
45 Colt11201132
45 Scholfield11n/a14Bn/a
45 Winchester Magnum2A362n/a
45-100n/an/a17n/a
45-110n/an/a17n/a
45-120n/an/a17n/a
45-70 Government8141714
45-90n/an/a17n/a
450 Marlin5413n/a
454 Casull112011n/a
455 Webley538n/an/a
458 WinchesterMagnum54n/a5
460 Weatherby Magnumn/a14n/an/a
475 Linebaugh540n/an/a
475 Wildyn/an/a2n/a
480 Ruger540n/an/a
5.6 x 50 Ri mmedn/a61n/a
50 Action Express11337n/a
50-70 Governmentn/a3122n/a
50-90n/an/a22n/a
500 S&Wn/a44n/an/a
6 mm 062n/an/an/a
6 mm Int 'l2n/an/an/a
6 mm Remington23n/an/a
6 mm/2842n/an/an/a
6 x 47 (6 mm/222M)4n/an/an/a
6.5 / 0623n/an/a
6.5 Carcano2n/an/an/a
6.5 Jap1015n/an/a
6.5 Remington Magnum5n/a5n/a
6.5 x 54 Manlicher-Schoenauern/a9n/an/a
6.5 x 55 Mauser3227n/a
6.5 x 57232n/a
6.5 x 57R Mausern/an/a14Bn/a
6.5 x 68Sn/a34n/an/a
7 mm BR23n/an/a
7 mm Rem Short Ultra Magn/a38n/an/a
7 mm Remington Magnum5413n/a
7 mm STWn/a413n/a
7 mm TCU41026n/a
7 mm Ultra Mag53813n/a
7 mm Weatherby54135
7 mm Win S Mag543n/an/a
7 mm/082321
7 x 30 Waters326n/a
7 x 57 mm Mauser2321
7 x 61 Sharpe&Hart5n/an/an/a
7 x 64 Brenneken/a32n/a
7 x 65 Ri mmedn/a2614Bn/a
7.5 mm Schmidt32n/an/a
7.5 x 54 MASn/a2n/an/a
7.62 x 3912323n/a
7.62 x 54 Russian161317n/a
7.65 x 53 Arg.Mauser3n/a2n/a
7.65 x 53 Mauser33n/an/a
7.7 Jap.23n/an/a
7.9 x 57n/an/a2n/a
8 mm 0623n/an/a
8 mm Lebel171n/an/a
8 mm Man.Schoe.23n/an/a
8 mm Nambun/a25n/an/a
8 mm Remington Magnum54135
8 mm x 68S Magnumn/a34n/an/a
8 x 56R Hungarian16n/an/an/a
8 x 57 JRSn/an/a14Bn/a
8 x 57 JSn/an/a2n/a
8 x 57 Mauser2321
9 mm LUGER191128
9 mm LUGER61128
9 mm Makn/a112n/a
9 x 21191128
9 x 23191128
9.3 mm x 74 Ri mmedn/a4n/an/a
9.3 x 62 Mausern/a32n/a
PPC1232n/an/a

Sunday, February 09, 2014

Notes from the other shop...

I was at the other shop and was paid a visit by Don S_____ of Waynesboro with his father's cartridge collection, or rather, a part of the collection.  Some neat things one doesn't often see.  Among those was a tin of Kynoch .470 Nitro Express cartridges.  Unopened.  Mint label.  No corrosion or staining.  WOW!  I'm including a photo of an opened tin just so you can have an idea what this is. 

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Browning Model 71 and the .348 Winchester

As with most cartridges created by the big firearms firms, the .348 Winchester had its foundations in marketing. Winchester had a problem. First, soldiers returning from the great war were enamored of the bolt action rifle and the ballistics of the .30-06 cartridge. Second, there was a desire to continue with Winchester's "trademark" line of lever-actions. So, the ideal thing would be to put .30-06 ballistics in a lever-action. Apparently, the Model 1895 just hadn't done it for the public with a magazine that was right where the balance point meant that one should put one's hand when carrying the gun.

I have a Browning 1895 and I think it carries well enough but it doesn't feel in the hand the way that shooters were accustomed. Although the 1895 was chambered for the .30-06 cartridge, I have read of accounts of lengthening headspace and problems with the cartridge in the rifle. I don't know if those reports are true or if they really impacted sales. Another problem was that the 1895 didn't look right with that magazine. I don't think that bothered performance oriented users, one sees the rifle in almost universal use in some law enforcement circles. Then, too, a lot of the production of the gun came during the first world war and went to the Russian military.

Winchester had other problems as well. The continuing depression meant that there wasn't a desire to put a lot of money into development of another rifle or cartridge. So, Winchester made what they thought would be a double good move and modernize the 1886 rifle (i.e. redesign it internally to reduce production cost), continuing what they'd begun with the 1886 extra lightweight in .45-70 and .33 Winchester, while at the same time improving the ballistics of the .30-something cartridge with the .348 Winchester.

A .50-110 cartridge case was modified with taper (for easy feeding while retaining good case capacity) topped with 150-250 grain bullets and chambered to a slightly modified 1886 rifle dubbed the Model 71. Ballistic realities intruded to defeat the popular acceptance of the 150 and 250 grain bullets and the 200 grain bullet at about 2500 fps from the 24" barreled rifle came to dominate sales. The current Winchester .348 factory load (if you can find it) uses a 200 grain Silvertip bullet (SD .236) at a muzzle velocity (MV) of 2520 fps from a 24" barrel. The muzzle energy (ME) of this load is 2820 ft. lbs. The figures at 200 yards are 1931 fps and 1656 ft. lbs. The trajectory of the Winchester factory load looks like this: +1.4" at 100 yards, 0 at 150 yards, -3.4" at 200 yards, and -9.2" at 250 yards. The big case meant that one could easily attain these .30-06 sort of ballistics while keeping pressures relatively low and the tapered case ran through the action with ease. The power of the cartridge ensured that it had a following among hunters of the largest game but it wasn't too powerful for use on whitetail deer. This made the cartridge just popular enough to hang around, sometimes just barely, since it was introduced in 1936. Sometimes it seems that the wildcatting and reforming uses of the brass were the only reason that production of the .348 cartridge continued at all but it has and in 1987 Browning saw fit to bring back the rifles in 20" and 24" barreled versions. This is the rifle I finally acquired.

Browning made 4,000 20" carbines and 3,000 24" rifles in standard grade, and 3,000 of each in deluxe grade. Made by Miroku in Japan as were the Browning 1892, 1886, and 1895 rifles and carbines, these are excellent firearms. Fit and finish is outstanding. The wood is lacking "figure" but that's fine on a working firearm where the sturdiness of the stock is far more important than appearance. These rifles, produced by adoptees of the metric system, do not have the same threads on any of the threaded parts as on the Winchester Model 71 so parts aren't often interchangeable.

Seller's photo of the Browning M71 Carbine
My "rifle" is the "carbine", i.e. it has the 20" barrel. I am one of those oddities of the shooting world who likes the shorter barrels and is willing to accept the ballistic limitations one gets. It has the feel of a bulldog between the hands. The stock seems to fit me well and the sights naturally align with the eye when the gun is shouldered. It seems heavier than my Browning 1886 SRC. Like the 1886, it will soon have a Williams Foolproof receiver sight.

Links:
- The Model 71 Winchester and the .348 WCF Cartridge by Jim Taylor
- The Browning M71 by Miles Fortis

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Need reloading bench plans?

The National Reloading Association put out these plans many years ago. I have a printed copy from them but found these on-line. What isn't on-line? They are intended for somebody who is standing as he works. One could do a number of things with such a bench other than reloading.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

7.7 Japanese loading....

You won't often see this brought up anymore but some folks still buy ammo and shoot the guns and some folks still try to load it.  Bullets are easy, the commercial product for the .303 Brit works just fine, you can even use .303 Brit loads as data.  Brass can be a problem though.  Most people start with .30-06 brass, often it is once fired (sometimes several times fired).  Use this brass with a case head nominally .025" smaller in OD in a larger than average chamber, pressures in the 40K+ PSI range, add in the factor of the brass being work-hardened and you might have an instance of cases splitting at the head.  Not desirable.   




Wednesday, December 28, 2011

2012 Hodgdon Annual Manual is in stores...

Hodgdon started something with the Annual Manual.  For those of us who no longer need the basic how-tos of reloading the data in these is a valuable and useful resource and the new articles, some hyping and informative about Hodgdon's new powders are useful, too.  This year the new powder is CFE i.e. Copper Fouling Eraser.  Whatever.  It seems that it might be a seller.  Also in this years manual was a great article on the .300 AAC Blackout.  More on this cartridge later but it might be what I'm looking for in a Virginia legal cartridge for the AR-15 (the .223 Rem/5.56mm NATO isn't legal for deer as I write this).  I found my copy at a grocery store.  Get 'em where and when you can, these are well worth the rather modest cost.

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Measuring reloading powders...

Over the years I've been reloading I've read a lot on the subject and heard many adherents of the hobby describe their favored techniques. However, until the internet I'd never heard some of the inane and ridiculous ideas that now, due to the pervasiveness of the digital word, have been widely spread. Subtract actual knowledge of the subject and a person can be truly confused. We get those in the gun shop every day. Yesterday I had one fellow walk in and ask for 2 lbs of "pistol powder". My attempt at a tactful interrogation designed to give him what he wanted that wouldn't result in a liability lawsuit for the store resulted in the realization by this fellow that he knew nothing about the subject.

While reloaders/handloaders will go on and on about various minutiae concerning the hobby the truth is that the one thing that gets more reloaders in trouble is the powder. It is critical that one use an appropriate powder for the cartridge and for the bullet you're going to be using in that cartridge and, in some cases (no pun intended), for the particular firearm in which the resulting cartridge is to be fired. Use the wrong powder or use the wrong amount of powder and you might have a "kaboom" resulting in the immediate and catastrophically spontaneous dis-assembly of the firearm. Using the correct amount of any given powder is critical and the subject upon which I'd like to pontificate today.

In the old days the dark lord of powders was the one and only BLACK POWDER, as it is known now. Back then it was simply "gun powder". It was corned and sorted by screens into various granulations or sizes. One had to use the correct granulation to get the best results but only in extreme circumstances would mis-measuring powder result in a "kaboom". Gun powder was measured by volume but often there was a concept, at the very least, of how much the nominal weight of that volume of powder was. We continue that today in using black powder and have formulated black powder substitutes with the goal of using them, volume for volume, interchangeably with black powder.

However, gun powder (as we knew it then) was messy and smoky. Smoky was bad because it gave your position away, bad because you couldn't see through the smoke it produced, and undesirable because these two attributes made it problematic for use in fully automatic arms (i.e. machineguns). Being the inventive people we are "smokeless" powders were invented. It was soon discovered that one couldn't handle these with the same cavalier attitude with which the "old-fashioned" black powder had been used. Misapplication of the early smokeless powders quickly showed that these powders could create pressures that could easily defeat their containers, i.e. firearms. One of the results of this was the promulgation of the common sense admonition to weigh smokeless powder charges.

Of course this would never do to support the necessarily high production levels of commercial and military ammunition production. Mass production demanded measuring powder by volume. The safeguards used were many (and yet they sometimes fail) but all involved extensive testing of each car load of powder and checking the volumetric measuring systems to ensure they inserted the correct amount of powder by weight. Since it was clear that with such safeguards volumetric measuring of some powders in some rounds/loads was acceptable over the years any number of volumetric measuring devices have been developed. However, reloaders using these measuring devices, be they dippers or what all, have always been cautioned to check that they are getting the correct weight. For that, one needs a scale.

However, the now widespread use of progressive loading machines, once priced out of reach of the average shooter, have made volumetric measuring of the charges for thousands of rounds without weight checking seemingly common. Because familiarity truly does breed contempt there are now reloaders who believe that they need only measure by volume and that at least some of the volumetric measuring systems are infallible. Some have taken to promulgating the idea that they can just chuck the scale in favor of one of these devices.

There are some problems with this idea.

- Powders change - over time powders change. They pick up moisture. They change at least in some small way from lot to lot.  They might even come from different production facilities.
- Adjustable volumetric measuring devices change - the effects of vibration/shock endured in use will cause the devices to go out of adjustment (so we check against the scales).  Powders have to flow consistently into the device to maintain consistent weights (which requires a certain level of skill by the user).  Changes in charges require comparison with a known quantity (a scale). 
- Non-adjustable volumetric measuring devices also require skill in use - to get consistent powder flow and fills of the non-adjustable devices also requires a certain skill level.  Further, since they aren't adjustable one is limited to certain charges.  For safety's sake these should be the minimum charge levels where both the highest and the lowest possible charge weights are proven to be safe.  This isn't possible with some powders.

The biggest problem is human nature.  I've seen it before.  The new reloader starts cautiously, carefully adhering to all warnings but then he wants more.  More power, more velocity and consequently closer to the edge of safety.  Does he stop and get a scale?  No.  Comfortable with the system and confident in his own ability to "read" or operate the device or he tries to do what is impossible with such methods, create precisely measured charges of powders at the edge of safe pressures.  Most often he blows a primer or creates another immediately recognizable sign of excessive pressures and re-examines his methodology.  Unfortunately, sometimes, he ignores the obvious signs he's exceeded safe parameters and drives on to destroy his firearm or worse. 

So, just as it has been for about 100 years, it is best to at least double check your powder measures with a scale.  Oh, and check the scale with a set of check weights. 

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Kabooms and rumors of kabooms...

Yesterday I heard talk of a man at a local range who was shooting a .30-40 using "reloads" which "exploded" and injured the left side of his face so badly 911 was called.  That's it.  No mention of which rifle model or any other details.

Of course we'd like to know the details.  More than likely, since reloads were used, there was an error on the part of the person who made them.  Part of that error may have been in underestimating the strength of the firearm.  Most firearms chambered for this round, I think all but the Ruger #3 or #1s, are old guns, using old metallurgy.  Instead of using the least pressure load to duplicate the old factory stuff, there are those who want to maximize the round's/gun's performance.  They push pressures too high.  Even the U.S. military discovered that in trying to up the performance of the .30-40 round.  They had problems with the service rifles in which they used that "improved" ammunition and so they withdrew it and went another way in firearms development.

However, we have no idea exactly what happened and this is usually true in such cases.  Perhaps, sooner or later, the shooter will do a mea culpa in an on-line forum and post photos of his damaged/destroyed firearm and/or his wounds.  Maybe, he will have figured out what likely happened and admit to it.  Until he does we are left wondering and with a renewed commitment to safe and sane reloading practices.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Jamison International Kaput...

Old news by now but I had a thought that I better record it here, for posterity don't you know, that Jamison International, makers and purveyors of cartridge brass, common and rare, are closing the doors.  The last orders have presumably shipped, the fights for the assets have presumably begun and a new iteration will likely appear when markets permit.  They did well when the government took all they could produce but they ignored their private sector customers for the big government contracts and have little brand loyalty to fall back on.  I believe I do have some of their .45-75 brass.  It is supposed to be good, although mine has never been loaded.  Anyway, the company is now one for the history books and a future reloader's trivia question.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Projects...

Because the weather hasn't been conducive to hunting (really windy or really raining) I've been working on reloading projects. I started by doing .45 Auto Rim, loading Mount Baldy 250 gr. Keith bullets over 7 gr. of Unique. Now that I've filled that brass, I've got another project, M1 Rifle ammunition for the Garand. I've got a lot of brass, 500 bullets, and enough powder to get them all loaded. Not certain if I've got space for the ammo though.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Sources for Black Powder...

Black powder. Some call it "holy black" others tell you to come to the "dark side". There is a whole shooting sub-culture who think that all the other propellants are just a passing fad. It is old tech, low tech, and sometimes none of the modern smokeless replacements or substitutes will do. Sometimes, you just MUST have black powder, no ifs or ands about it. But that can present some problems.

You see, most gun stores won't carry it. Fire codes, lease agreements, insurance, location/neighbors, are all reasons cited for not stocking the easy to ignite explosive. Also, you need quite a lot of it. I use about 70-80 gr. per shot so that's only about 100 shots per pound. So, where do you get it?

Locally we have Back Creek Gun Shop in Winchester, Virginia. Yes, I said "locally" even though it is 90 miles away. Are there alternatives? Of course.

The Maine Powder House in Limington, Maine.
Powder Inc. in Clarksville, Arkansas.
Jack's Powder Keg in Marksville, Louisiana.
Upper Missouri Trading Company in Crofton, Nebraska.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Hodgdon's Burn Rate Chart

I am not a chemist, physicist, engineer, or doctor of anything. I am a long time reloader. Sometimes I'm asked for advice. Sometimes that question goes something like this...

"PowderX has the 'same' burn rate as PowderY, can't I use it instead of spending money my wife doesn't really want me to have on PowderY?"

In reply I have several concerns. First, and most importantly, I made the recommendation based on published data and my own experience. I didn't just lift my hat and pull out something to get you off my back. If I don't know, I say "I don't know" and likewise if something has worked for me that's what I recommend. If you don't want to spend the money maybe you shouldn't be playing the game.

Second, and more technically, every time you change a component you change the dynamics of entire load in ways that you, also not a chemist, physicist, engineer or doctor of anything, can't predict. The writers of the manuals and the lab workers developed the manual data based on their experiences measured using equipment with which they were familiar in known conditions. They didn't pull that data out of their headgear either. There is a REASON that that data is published and data for your substitute can't be found. There is no grand conspiracy to reach into your wallet for another $25 or to deny you the ability to load cartridge A with bullet B at velocity C. As for me and my recommendations, I'm not going to start thinking that I somehow have some special insight as to why what is in the manual is or what is not in the manual is not.

All that said, can one make substitutes? Yes, if one can reason, i.e. think logically and to do that one needs information and for that one needs the manual AND experience. If you had all that you wouldn't be asking me questions.

Anyway, the burn rate chart is interesting and now that I've thoroughly alienated you I need to throw you a bone so here it is, the most recent burn rate chart copied from the Hodgdon chart.

1 NORMA R1 73 VihtaVuori N120
2 Winchester WAALite 74 Hodgdon H322
3 VihtaVuori N310 75 Accurate Arms 2015BR
4 Accurate Arms Nitro 100 76 Alliant Reloder 10X
5 Alliant e3 77 VihtaVuori N130
6 Hodgdon TITEWAD 78 IMR, Co IMR 3031
7 Ramshot Competition 79 VihtaVuori N133
8 Alliant Red Dot 80 Hodgdon BENCHMARK
9 Alliant Promo 81 Hodgdon H335
10 Hodgdon CLAYS 82 Ramshot X-Terminator
11 Alliant Clay Dot 83 Accurate Arms 2230
12 IMR, Co Hi-Skor 700-X 84 Accurate Arms 2460s
13 Alliant Bullseye 85 IMR, Co IMR 8208 XBR
14 Hodgdon TITEGROUP 86 Ramshot TAC
15 Alliant American Select 87 Hodgdon H4895
16 Accurate Arms Solo 1000 88 VihtaVuori N530
17 Alliant Green Dot 89 IMR, Co IMR 4895
18 Winchester WST 90 VihtaVuori N135
19 IMR, Co Trail Boss 91 Alliant Reloder 12
20 Winchester Super Handicap 92 Accurate Arms 2495BR
21 Hodgdon INTERNATIONAL 93 IMR, Co IMR 4064
22 Accurate Arms Solo 1250 94 NORMA 202
23 IMR, Co PB 95 Accurate Arms 4064
24 VihtaVuori N320 96 Accurate Arms 2520
25 Accurate Arms No. 2 97 Alliant Reloder 15
26 Ramshot Zip 98 VihtaVuori N140
27 IMR, Co SR 7625 99 Hodgdon VARGET
28 Hodgdon HP-38 100 IMR, Co IMR 4320
29 Winchester 231 101 Winchester 748
30 Alliant 20/28 102 Hodgdon BL-C(2)
31 Alliant Unique 103 Hodgdon LEVEREVOLUTION
32 Hodgdon UNIVERSAL 104 Hodgdon H380
33 Alliant Power Pistol 105 IMR, Co IMR 4007 SSC
34 VihtaVuori N330 106 Ramshot Big Game
35 Alliant Herco 107 VihtaVuori H540
36 Winchester WSF 108 Winchester 760
37 VihtaVuori N340 109 Hodgdon H414
38 IMR, Co Hi-Skor 800-X 110 VihtaVuori N150
39 IMR, Co SR 4756 111 Accurate Arms 2700
40 Ramshot True Blue 112 IMR, Co IMR 4350
41 Accurate Arms No. 5 113 Hodgdon H4350
42 Hodgdon HS-6 114 Alliant Reloder 17
43 Winchester AutoComp 115 Accurate Arms 4350
44 Ramshot Silhouette 116 NORMA 204
45 VihtaVuori 3N37 117 Hodgdon HYBRID 100V
46 VihtaVuori N350 118 VihtaVuori N550
47 Hodgdon HS-7 119 Alliant Reloder 19
48 VihtaVuori 3N38 120 IMR, Co IMR 4831
49 Alliant Blue Dot 121 Ramshot Hunter
50 Accurate Arms No. 7 122 Accurate Arms 3100
51 Alliant Pro Reach 123 VihtaVuori N160
52 Hodgdon LONGSHOT 124 Hodgdon H4831 & H4831SC
53 Alliant 410 125 Hodgdon SUPERFORMANCE
54 Alliant 2400 126 Winchester Supreme 780
55 Ramshot Enforcer 127 NORMA MRP
56 Accurate Arms No. 9 128 Alliant Reloder 22
57 Accurate Arms 4100 129 VihtaVuori N560
58 Alliant Steel 130 VihtaVuori N165
59 NORMA R123 131 IMR, Co IMR 7828
60 VihtaVuori N110 132 Alliant Reloder 25
61 Hodgdon LIL'GUN 133 VihtaVuori N170
62 Hodgdon H110 134 Accurate Arms Magpro
63 Winchester 296 135 Hodgdon H1000
64 IMR, Co IMR 4227 136 Ramshot Magnum
65 Hodgdon H4227 137 Hodgdon RETUMBO
66 IMR, Co SR 4759 138 VihtaVuori N570
67 Accurate Arms 5744 139 Accurate Arms 8700
68 Accurate Arms 1680 140 Hodgdon H870
69 NORMA 200 141 VihtaVuori 24N41
70 Alliant Reloder 7 142 Hodgdon H50BMG
71 IMR, Co IMR 4198 143 Hodgdon US869
72 Hodgdon H4198 144 VihtaVuori 20N29

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

The Dunbar Press

I had never heard of it until yesterday.  I then discovered that our gunsmith owns one, worked with the inventor to help produce them, and that one of the inventor's sons is a customer at the shop.

The Dunbar Press
What is the Dunbar Press?  Well I hope to find out more when the son, a regular, comes in at the same time I'm there.

Dunbar, West Virginia is just west of Charleston. Dunbar Glass began in 1923 with the formation of the Dunbar Flint Glass Corporation and produced glassware for nearly 30 years. Dunbar produced a variety of glass products starting with glass chimneys then specialized in glass pitcher and tumbler sets, kitchen items, vases, barware, and tumble ups. That they could survive the depression says a great deal about the popularity of their glass. Dunbar prospered and in 1932 they featured designs by John Held Jr. These were sold in both Bloomingdale's and Macy's. In the 1940s Dunbar was a major competitor. In the late 1940s Dunbar was producing lighting fixtures, private mold glassware, heat resisting cookware and vases for florists. By 1956 Dunbar was struggling. They were trying to find a profitable product. Competition from overseas made producing glassware difficult. The board of directors decided to concentrate on on machine drawn tubing development and cut back on the more expensive glassware they were noted for. Soon after this decision Dunbar closed its doors. It was about this time that the Dunbar Press was produced. The press was developed by a Mr. Thomas William Cook (1918-2001) of West View, VA, who sold the production rights to Dunbar Glass.


USS Rich after striking the magnetic mine off Normandy
Mr. Cook worked for Dupont before the war and had been moved from the valley to Wilmington, Delaware which he did to keep his job.  Knowing that the draft would eventually get him he chose to enlist to ensure he could do what he wanted and what he believed would be the best contribution to the war effort.  A Machinist's Mate 3rd in the U. S. Navy during WWII, Mr. Cook was on board the destroyer escort USS Rich (DE695), a Buckley class vessel, on D-Day+2 (June 8, 1944)  when it struck several mines and was severely damaged and sunk.  Mr. Cook was at his battle station on the fantail AA gun when the second mine detonated and he was blown approximately 150 feet into the water.  Although he survived he was disabled and nearly lost his legs.  Several years were needed for recovery and for the rest of his life the military provided him with special shoes but he did walk again. 

Finally on the mend and with a young family, Mr. Cook had his own shop and did precision, small scale, special work for many local companies and even NASA.  He continued to make some press parts in his shop for the press maker even after press production moved to Roanoke, Virginia.  Mr. Cook loved machine work and shooting so much that he built a single-action .22 LR revolver from scratch except for the barrel blank. 

His son, Benny, still has one of his dad's presses which is dated 1958 and on which he has loaded many thousands of rounds.  Former employee, Lewis Gough, also has a press.  It is said that the press made Mr. Cook some "good money".  Mr. Cook's son tells me that press production continued through at least 1960. 

Modern-Bond "Type D"
The press is very strong and threaded for the now standard 7/8-14 thread so it is compatible with current dies.  However, a shell holder adapter from CH Tool is required to use current shell holders.  This would be an excellent press for reloaders using 2-die sets for bottle-neck cartridges.

As I've been researching this press I've been curious about the value of these presses.  One recently sold on eBay for $242.00.  That would make it well worthwhile to restore one as Mr. Kevin Rohrer did.

There was an earlier and very similar press, the single-station Modern-Bond "Type D". Apparently this press was only produced from 1935 to 1938. It is likely that the depression and then WWII killed it off.

Herter's of Waseca, Minnesota apparently made/marketed the Herter's Super Model 9 press which is a "copy" of the Dunbar.  I'm not quite sure how long it was on the market but I seem to remember the press in the late 1960s although I can't be certain. There was also the Hollywood and Texan presses.  CH-Tool made the 333 press and now produces the 444 press (which does not require shell holder adapters).

I will be continuing my research...
Herter's Super Model 9

Saturday, June 18, 2011

.224" bullets

Like many others, I shoot a variety of .22 caliber cartridges.  .22 Hornet, .218 Bee, and .223 Remington/5.56 NATO.  I'm not into the big .22s like the Swift, .22-250 or .225 Winchester.  I've no use for them.  These are the bullets I'm currently using in my .22 caliber rifles.  I initially took this photo because I thought it would be interesting to compare them to the current and former standard military bullets.

Starting with the littlest on the left we have the Hornady 35 gr. VMAX.  A "ballistic tip" bullet, you can see it isn't as aerodynamically shaped as the others.  In fact, I've heard it referred to as "a brick" for its lack of aerodynamic shape.  The ballistic coefficient (BC) for this bullet is .109 and the sectional density (SD) is .100.  However, this bullet seems to be a good one and fairly popular.  It will give me 1-1/2" groups in the .22 Hornet even with mixed brass.  It also provided an instant kill AND complete penetration on a ground hog at only 10 yards.  I don't think this bullet opens too quickly and yet it certainly opened quickly enough.  Over 13 gr. of Lil'Gun it gives about 3000 fps from the Hornet. All together that's plenty good enough performance for me.  However, when I've shot up my stock of these bullets I'm going to switch to the next bullet for the Hornet, just to reduce the number of different bullets on the shelf.

Next is the 40 gr. VMAX.  As you can see it is quite a bit more aerodynamic than the 35 gr.  What a difference just 5 gr. in bullet weight can make in bullets of this diameter.  The BC is up to .200 and the SD is .114.  I've been loading this bullet in the the .218 Bee over 14 gr. of Lil'Gun which, if memory serves, moves it along at about 3100 fps.  However, speed isn't the only thing and this bullet is pretty accurate in my custom Contender barrel.  Groups from the bench unsupported position average around 1" and some-times I can manage tiny cloverleafs at 100 yards.

Third from the left is the standard 55 gr. FMJBT for the 5.56mm cartridge.  I bought 5000 of these in bulk for loading for my old Colt SP-1 sporter carbine.  This is the same bullet used in the military's M193 cartridge.  I don't suppose there's anything really wrong with it.  This bullet is what my old gun's barrel twist rate seemed to demand and I was only using it for practice so the FMJ design wasn't a handicap.  However, FMJ bullets are illegal for hunting in many places, even for forbearing animals, and so a better solution is needed for my current 5.56mm AR-15 type rifle.  BC is .243.

Fourth, with the remnants of tar is the 62 gr. green-tip bullet.  Pulled from loaded ammo this is the current standard bullet in 5.56mm M855 cartridge.  BC is .304.  I got this ammo just to compare it to my own handholds with the next bullet and so I haven't shot it much.  I really have no use or need for an FMJ bullet if I can get soft points at a low enough price.  By the way, the U.S. military is shortly going to (they may have already done so) introduce the M855A1 bullet.  The weight is the same but the new bullet is politically correct and lacking lead (and green tip) so that it doesn't pollute the poor schmo a soldier might shoot with it.

That cheap and bulk packed bullet is second from the right (fifth from the left) and it is the 64 gr. Winchester Power Point.  I've been told this is the same bullet the California Highway Patrol uses in their ammunition.  As those patrol rifles have to take care of a number of scenarios, I expected this bullet to be a pretty good one and it seems to be.  Of course I'm using it in the 5.56mm/.223 Rem cartridge (yes, I know they aren't exactly the same).  In some states (maybe even Virginia in the near future) it will be legal for deer.  BC for this bullet is .234 and SD is .182.

Last is the 77 gr. Sierra BTHP.  With a cannelure this is the bullet that is specially loaded for certain military applications.  Due to this "elite" cachet it is quite in demand, cannelure or not.  I bought 100 to try in my new AR-15 carbine.  Even though that gun has a 1 in 9" twist rate I was concerned that the bullet wouldn't stabilize.  Most seem to think that the 1 in 7" twist is necessary to stabilize this bullet.   Then again, just because a barrel is labeled with a particular twist rate it might vary a bit, fast or slow, depending on how it was rifled.  The barrel in my gun seems to stabilize this bullet but I'm going to do some more testing at 150 yards just to be certain.  I like the looks of the long slender bullet but it does intrude below the shoulder of the .223/5.56mm case and that concerns some people.  I have been using WW748 for all my loads in this cartridge and it works just fine.  I don't think I want to change.

Links:
- ASSAULT RIFLES AND THEIR AMMUNITION: HISTORY AND PROSPECTS by Anthony G. Williams

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Black Powder Loading the .45-75

To quote Rick Bachman of Old West Reproductions,
I've been shooting and reloading the .45-75 for over 40 years. I've used all of the granulations in blackpowder and always come back to 2F. I always load to original factory specs and the 350 grain lead bullet with 72 grains of 2F black works extremely well. The 2F black is what UMC and Winchester used in manufacturing factory ammunition of this caliber. I have experience only with original '76 rifles and carbines and I reload with original Winchester bullet molds and reloading tools. The only brass that was available years ago was .348 Win., and that is what I still use today. These cases are heavy and will only hold about 72 grains of 2F when weighed on a scale, but I load by volume and slightly compress my loads under a card wad. I have never had a cartridge failure and I've never had a gun that wouldn't shoot this ammo with great accuracy.
Does one need to go any further? I don't think so.