Showing posts with label Rifles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rifles. Show all posts

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Ruger 10/22 M1 Carbine Look-Alike

Well, I took the Ruger 10-22 set up to look like the Carbine U.S. M1 .30 cal to the range. Sighted it in with the 30 year old Winchester High Velocity 40gr. RNs. Needed to use shotgun shell body shim under the rear sight to bring the sight up enough to zero at 25 yards (and, so it turns out, at 50 yards). The rear sight also needed some movement to the left. That took only 3 tries. I was very surprised to find that the gun will easily hit a golf ball at 50-yards. That's pretty darn good with the provided peep sights even from a supported position. Now, off-hand that is a challenge. The combination of very light weight and much rougher trigger (compared to the Kingston Armory 10/22 "copy") made it a real challenge.

I was also surprised to find that very similar loads (weight and velocity) shot close enough to the same point of aim to give one a very good chance at the golf ball.

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Offhand shooting and the M1-22 Kingston Armory Rifle

Several people have asked me how well the Kingston Armory M1-22 rifle shoots. As anyone with any experience knows, choice of ammo and the eye's (mine) ability to distinguish sights and target will have some small influence on the results. So...

I have been shooting a lot of Winchester High Velocity 40 gr. RN stuff purchased about 1986 and stored inside in U.S. Army ammo cans. I had several bricks of it. Some I had used in rimfire silhouette but when that went away I quit shooting it in preference for Power Points of SGB modified Dynapoints for hunting. I also shot a quantity of Golden Bullets (Remington) hollow points. So, when I got this rifle I thought semi-auto+hivel ammo=fault free function. That's been mostly true, until I got the gun dirty enough to hiccup now and then. So this old Winchester ammo is what I used to shoot the rifle and provide some idea of its capabilities.
 
The sights. They are GI, literally. I think they use either new old stock (or parts therefrom) or new manufacture replacements. The rear sight base is made just for the 10-22 receiver profile. That means you have a peep rear and a thick post front sight. Some people need to learn to shoot these, I've been shooting them for years.

However, my eyesight can be a problem. I've worn glasses since I was 6, bifocals since I was 55, and have known I had cataracts for 2 years. Sometimes I can't focus on anything much less see the target after focusing on the front sight.

Let's not talk about physical conditioning. I am NOT the infantry stud I might have been (in my mind) some 15-18 years ago! When I first stepped to the line with the rifle I thought I must be standing on jello everything was weaving around so much. Things have improved.
Why shoot the gun off-hand (standing, unsupported)? Because we are going to have a golf ball shoot under those conditions (no slings either). Also, because we should be able to shoot this way and might need to.

So how well does it shoot with me behind the butt? I can pretty consistently shoot 30% on a golf ball at 50 yards. I did 70-80% on a 4" diameter disk this past Thursday. Off the bench it is practically a sure thing on the golf ball at 50 yards. I own every miss. It is all me.

Monday, May 16, 2016

.22 Benchrest

I started a couple of years ago. Wasn't really interested, didn't have an appropriate firearm but Nana "made" me do it. Got a 1955 produced Winchester 52C, mounted a Weaver 36X and got some moderately priced (relatively) .22 LR target/match ammunition, and a rest. I've had some success, in other words I've improved. Then again, I am just in the middle of the pack, an average shooter. Some of it is equipment, I don't have a one piece rest, don't use the most expensive ammo, haven't tweaked the rifle, etc. Some is me, my eyesight, my technique, my level of interest/commitment. However, I still enjoy it. Good people, a problem to solve without any more pressure to solve it than I choose to put on myself, time away from life's concerns, all good to me. The game isn't particularly physically challenging either. With planning and enough interest to get adaptive equipment a person who was confined to a wheelchair, missing limbs, and having who knows how many other physical challenges can participate. Gender is absolutely not an issue. Turns out to be great fun.

Yesterday I shot at our club. The wind was whipping with gusts of 45-50 mph but mostly at 15-25 mph and the temperature never got over 56°F. Challenging. I was still able to shoot better than I did at the season's first shoot a month ago. A good day all around.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Range day...

I had a great range day. Took the .17 HMR Contender to zero. Easy to shoot and quick to sight in, the .17 was right on out to 75 yards with both the 17 and 25 gr. bullets. I can see why some folks just love this cartridge. The factory Contender barrel was clearly accurate despite my shooting from a supported sitting position without a solid rest. This should be an outstanding pest killer. It is almost unfortunate that I have no pests I can use this to eliminate.

I also took the Browning 1911-22 out. I also had a box plus 10 of the old Russian Junior ammo (in the green box). This is not usually the best of ammo. Steel cased and subject to sometime contamination of the powder charge by the bullet lube, it is NOT known for accuracy particularly after all these years (at least 25 years since I purchased it). However, in the little Browning pistol it was surprisingly accurate and functional. There were zero failures to fire, feed, extract or eject which I sometimes have with this ammo from other pistols. I was able to hit fist sized rocks and dirt clumps very easily at 25-35 yards. I think this might be my ammo of choice with this pistol. A good thing because I have a couple of bricks of the stuff!

I also took the Tactical Solutions 1911 conversion with Burris FastFire. I was shooting both Federal and Winchester ammo in that gun but it is dirty and would not function with any reliability for the first 5 rounds in either magazine so I put it up.

Today's weather was not exactly what one would call shooter friendly. While the temperature was a relatively nice 51° at the range, the wind has been blowing 20-40 mph all day long. That really made it feel colder, particularly in shade at the bench.

Friday, February 13, 2015

Winchester Model 47 in the basement...

It ain't got nuttin' to do with cool revolvers, doesn't involve a white-out, and no hogs were harmed but my Winchester 47 is a fun gun. This is especially so on a cold (for Virginia) day or night, in my basement with ammo the wife can't hear fire even though she is only one solid wood door and a floor away.

The penny is for scale. 5 shots each of Aguila Colibri and CCI Quiet 22 solids (not the segmented bullet) at 27 feet from standing using a Winchester Model 47 with the issue open sights and with light on the target and behind the shooter. There is one pulled shot but the gun is backyard squirrel-head capable with either load.

I mostly shoot the Colibri and this has deposited some crud at the front of the chamber. It is highly advisable to clean the chamber before shooting ammo with a "regular" bullet in it. For those who might not know, the Colibri bullet looks more like an airgun pellet and it is commensurately short compared to the standard 40-grain RN of the Quiet22.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Benchrest .22 LR

The "saga" of the BR50 .22 continues. I was really pleased with my shooting today. Despite gusty conditions, I shot a 425. That placed me third of 14, 5 of 20 including the unlimited shooters and I tied with the national 13th seed shooter. The winning unlimited gun shot 465, there were 2 445s (a 9x and a 6x) in the factory class, an a 440 in the unlimited. This shooting a stock 52C, Weaver T36 and SK Standard Plus ammo. I could have done better as I made some form faults and was consistent behind the gun, but I am really pleased. Much better consistency today.

We would have had greater differences between shooters if we scored the targets for this unsanctioned match as they are "supposed' to be scored. I ought to take the time to "correctly" score my targets. That should prove interesting! I went back and re-scored the targets correctly, i.e. by the intended method, and scored 3685 9X. That was a 1760-2 on the first target and 1925-7 on the second target. OFFICIALLY, I think they are only supposed to shoot ONE 25 target sheet/stage. Now I'm interested in how much actual improvement I've made. So I scored my first target and I've had about a 20% improvement. I shot a 1450-2 and a 1535-0 for 2985-2 for that match. I take it that is really not so good but I am just starting. I am betting that my buddy's target would have scored much better than mine. He's shot several/many 50 of 50 at matches. I'm not there yet. But I do love this rifle... We have a 100 yard shoot this Sunday.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Rifle, U.S. M1, .30 Caliber blast deflector...

Received my copy of the Rock Island Auction catalog and seemed to be immediately drawn to lot 1535.  This is an M1 Rifle (Garand) with a unique blast deflector reportedly locally fabricated and used only in Alaska.  This is a gas-trap rifle.  A photo of the blast deflector is shown below.  Bruce Canfield's new book doesn't seem to mention it but it is possible I've overlooked that somehow.  Very interesting to me.  It would seem that it would have to be removed for operator cleaning.  The catalog copy says that only 3 are known to exist.  I've never seen or heard of one before.  Accordingly, this rifle's estimate is between $30,000 and $50,000! 


Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Winchester Model 47

Winchester Model 47 Target
The Winchester Model 47 is a single-shot bolt action .22 rimfire for the .22 Short, .22 Long and .22 Long Rifle cartridges.  Shown at left is the target version but most of the 40,000 some rifles produced between 1949 and 1954 had the standard open rear sight like mine (shown at the bottom of this article).  The gun is pretty neat in that the safety is automatically set every time you work the bolt.  I like it a lot despite the noticeably stiff trigger.

PS - I've been shooting this gun a lot with Aguila Colibri ammo. Nothing but a little click as the firing pin falls and another "ting" when the little 20 gr. bullet hits the steel backstop. It gave me a pretty good group!




Thursday, January 24, 2013

Browning Model 71 and the .348 Winchester

As with most cartridges created by the big firearms firms, the .348 Winchester had its foundations in marketing. Winchester had a problem. First, soldiers returning from the great war were enamored of the bolt action rifle and the ballistics of the .30-06 cartridge. Second, there was a desire to continue with Winchester's "trademark" line of lever-actions. So, the ideal thing would be to put .30-06 ballistics in a lever-action. Apparently, the Model 1895 just hadn't done it for the public with a magazine that was right where the balance point meant that one should put one's hand when carrying the gun.

I have a Browning 1895 and I think it carries well enough but it doesn't feel in the hand the way that shooters were accustomed. Although the 1895 was chambered for the .30-06 cartridge, I have read of accounts of lengthening headspace and problems with the cartridge in the rifle. I don't know if those reports are true or if they really impacted sales. Another problem was that the 1895 didn't look right with that magazine. I don't think that bothered performance oriented users, one sees the rifle in almost universal use in some law enforcement circles. Then, too, a lot of the production of the gun came during the first world war and went to the Russian military.

Winchester had other problems as well. The continuing depression meant that there wasn't a desire to put a lot of money into development of another rifle or cartridge. So, Winchester made what they thought would be a double good move and modernize the 1886 rifle (i.e. redesign it internally to reduce production cost), continuing what they'd begun with the 1886 extra lightweight in .45-70 and .33 Winchester, while at the same time improving the ballistics of the .30-something cartridge with the .348 Winchester.

A .50-110 cartridge case was modified with taper (for easy feeding while retaining good case capacity) topped with 150-250 grain bullets and chambered to a slightly modified 1886 rifle dubbed the Model 71. Ballistic realities intruded to defeat the popular acceptance of the 150 and 250 grain bullets and the 200 grain bullet at about 2500 fps from the 24" barreled rifle came to dominate sales. The current Winchester .348 factory load (if you can find it) uses a 200 grain Silvertip bullet (SD .236) at a muzzle velocity (MV) of 2520 fps from a 24" barrel. The muzzle energy (ME) of this load is 2820 ft. lbs. The figures at 200 yards are 1931 fps and 1656 ft. lbs. The trajectory of the Winchester factory load looks like this: +1.4" at 100 yards, 0 at 150 yards, -3.4" at 200 yards, and -9.2" at 250 yards. The big case meant that one could easily attain these .30-06 sort of ballistics while keeping pressures relatively low and the tapered case ran through the action with ease. The power of the cartridge ensured that it had a following among hunters of the largest game but it wasn't too powerful for use on whitetail deer. This made the cartridge just popular enough to hang around, sometimes just barely, since it was introduced in 1936. Sometimes it seems that the wildcatting and reforming uses of the brass were the only reason that production of the .348 cartridge continued at all but it has and in 1987 Browning saw fit to bring back the rifles in 20" and 24" barreled versions. This is the rifle I finally acquired.

Browning made 4,000 20" carbines and 3,000 24" rifles in standard grade, and 3,000 of each in deluxe grade. Made by Miroku in Japan as were the Browning 1892, 1886, and 1895 rifles and carbines, these are excellent firearms. Fit and finish is outstanding. The wood is lacking "figure" but that's fine on a working firearm where the sturdiness of the stock is far more important than appearance. These rifles, produced by adoptees of the metric system, do not have the same threads on any of the threaded parts as on the Winchester Model 71 so parts aren't often interchangeable.

Seller's photo of the Browning M71 Carbine
My "rifle" is the "carbine", i.e. it has the 20" barrel. I am one of those oddities of the shooting world who likes the shorter barrels and is willing to accept the ballistic limitations one gets. It has the feel of a bulldog between the hands. The stock seems to fit me well and the sights naturally align with the eye when the gun is shouldered. It seems heavier than my Browning 1886 SRC. Like the 1886, it will soon have a Williams Foolproof receiver sight.

Links:
- The Model 71 Winchester and the .348 WCF Cartridge by Jim Taylor
- The Browning M71 by Miles Fortis

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Remington Model 241

A few days ago I noted that Wayne F_________ told me that his uncle Carl F_________ had a Remington 241 he was wanting to sell.  I've been kinda interested in getting an example of the Browning SA22 for quite a long while.  I like the little short guns but let's face it, full-size guns are easier to shoot.  Anyway, I was told that this was an exceptional example but I thought I'd wait to pass judgement (in the form of exchanging money for gun, or not) until I'd gotten to see the firearm in question.

Yesterday Carl came by the shop to show me this and three other guns.

I'd like to note that Carl is a fine fellow.  A veteran of the Korean War as a member of the 187th Infantry Regiment (Rakkasans), Carl came home to the U.S. and had a career as an over-the-road truck driver.  He's been a lot of places and held his own with a lot of people and managed to keep body and soul together for over 80 years.  I like to think of him as a friend.  He also has and has had a wonderful knack for glomming on to some wonderful guns.

I wish I'd gotten a photo of the first gun he pulled out.  It was beautiful with about 98% condition, this was the nicest Colt New Service I've ever seen.  Chambered for the .45 Colt, Carl said that this would be one of the last guns he'd sell but he wanted to show me, just in case.  I think he's seeing the end of life approaching and wants to be prepared without coming out and saying so.  That sort of makes seeing and handling this treasure a real honor.  This was a later gun with the later version cylinder latch and checkered wood stocks.  It still had its original lanyard loop.  Made me think of Sergeant Preston of the Yukon!

He then took me out to his car to show me two rifles he had.  The first was an early M1 Carbine with the correct wood, sights and safety for early in the war and all original.  The cartouche was still visible as well.  VERY nice.  He also had a G33/40 rifle made in 1942.  This one had some of the wear one would expect from a rifle used in the rugged terrain where these units operated during WWII but the metal was in pretty good condition.

After looking at these play-pretties we got down to business on the rifle that had brought him to me in the first place.  A Remington 241 with some extras.  About 130,000 of the Model 24 and 24A guns were produced between 1922 and 1935 (some say to 1938). Then, coincidental with acquisition of Remington by Dupont, the 241 was designed as a product improvement and more than 107,000 of these were produced 1935 through 1951.  In redesigning the model 24 to the 241, the barrel quick release was moved to the side of the receiver and the parts were made slightly heavier (stronger) to handle the then new high speed ammunition.  This one is serial numbered 748__ (about 1947), has some really well-figured wood, a nifty Lyman receiver sight, the steel butt-plate, pistol grip cap and even an engine turned (jeweled) bolt.  I believe this would have been the Special grade gun with the sight.  Cost in 1940 would have been $42.15 for the gun and the Lyman sight would have been extra.  Just the rifle today would be $685 in our money or about the same as retail for the Browning .22 Auto.  The Lyman sights are often in the $100+ range.  This rifle being in excellent to fine condition, I'm very pleased to have it.



Of course it will go hunting, just like the 12CS and it might even take a turn at the metallic silhouette game.  I've shot it some more now and it will even function with the CCI .22 Quiet ammo!  Almost like having a silenced .22 and self-loading.  You can't beat that. 

Friday, August 12, 2011

The Browning Center Fire Pump Rifle

Browning BPR
Browning Dualis

By: Bruce Hamlin

Some of you may be familiar with an article I wrote concerning the history, models and variations of the Browning Lever Rifle (BLR).   That article was primarily written to cover the Browning line of center fire lever action rifles with a small amount of information covering other models of some interest to me.  That article can be found at http://www.pumprifle.org/index.php/member-articles/36-browningblr.

Two of those other Browning models were the center fire pump actions that they produced for just a few short years.  Those would be the Browning Pump Rifle (BPR) and Browning Dualis (European BPR version).  I won’t repeat my background or firearms/hunting history that I detailed in the BLR article, but I will go ahead and tell you that the BPRs in 30-06 are now my main go to rifles.  I still like my BLRs and who could not like a fine single shot rifle, but the pump rifles have taken over my interest.

One of the first issues I would like to cover is terminology.  I don’t know if it is regional, geographical or just a local thing, but we occasionally hear of pump action rifles being called slide action rifles.  Even though it is not the most common term used to describe the action, it does exist.  I have not spent a lot of time trying to prove which is the correct term, but I do note that the manufacturers seem to have a solid history of using the term “Pump Action”.  So, in my opinion - pump action it is!

Pump action center fire rifles have not really ever held the lead in rifle sales in most areas.  The exception to that statement is in some of the Northeast portions of the United States, where big game hunting with semiautomatic firearms is prohibited.  There, the pump actions appear to lead in sales and hunting use.  Also in those areas, it is clear that the Remington line of center fire pump rifles is the clear leader.  There are a few other brands of center fire pump rifles that have produced and sold, but like the Browning, they were never produced in great numbers or for extended periods of time.

I suspect that center fire pump action rifle sales come in about fourth behind semi-autos, bolt actions and lever guns.  I don’t know why that is, because I have very good reason to believe that rim fire pump action sales have a much better showing when compared to the other action types.  Maybe not first place, but I believe better than fourth.

For hunting purposes, the pump action is definitely faster to cycle and fire than the bolt action, should a second or follow up shot be needed.  Most sources (and some commercial ads) claim it is faster for the same reasons than a lever action rifle.  I have seen some mighty fast cowboy action shooters with some lever guns, but for most of us, I think the pump is a little faster.  However, I really don’t give much credence to which action is the fastest.  I try to make one shot kills, therefore accuracy and reliability are my first considerations.  Generally, I see little difference between actions, accuracy and reliability with the modern manufacturers when it comes to hunting situations - for most of us.

What draws me to the pump action rifle is the ability to cycle the action with my support (weak) hand, which allows me to keep the stock to my shoulder and my strong hand on the stock.  That allows me to recover a sight picture quicker and I don’t have to hunt for the trigger each shot like I do when shooting most lever actions and all bolt actions.  Also, it drives my hunting buddies crazy.  They think semi auto’s and bolt guns rule.

What draws me to the Browning BPR is the workmanship, quality, history, reliability and, finally, the fit.  I find that Browning firearms seem to fit me better and I can shoulder one with my eyes closed, open my eyes and generally I am looking straight down the sights (or scope) and the barrel, requiring very little adjustment to get a very good sight alignment and sight picture.  I find that when I do the same with most other brands, when I open my eyes, the barrel is always pointed up.  For example, I really have to get my head down on a Remington to get a good sight picture or alignment.  I know this is due to a difference in stock drop, LOP, my methods etc.., but to me - it is significant.

You have already probably noted that I have not written about accuracy.  To be honest, with today’s technology and manufacturing machinery, in my opinion most major quality manufacturer’s rifles deliver acceptable hunting accuracy with a variety of ammunition brands and bullet weights.  I can shoot fairly well and I do have some fairly high accuracy standards, but I have found most modern manufactured rifles will deliver.  The feeding/cycling of rounds from a magazine to the chamber must be flawless.  I don’t tolerate jams due to feeding issues or bad magazines.

Concerning center fire Brownings, I currently have a 1973 Belgium BAR  30-06, a 2009 BLR Lt. Wt. 81 30-06 takedown and two 1998 BPR’s in 30-06.  I do have a few other collectibles, but they don’t fit into this article. As I have previously written, I have almost converted my entire center fire rifle collection to only 30-06 rifles and I do not regret it. 

History

Production of the BPR began in 1997 and ended in 2001.  I have not been able to find solid information concerning the production years of the Dualis, but I believe it was close to 2001 through maybe 2009 or 2010.

The BPR barrels are stamped Made in Belgium - Assembled in Portugal, on the left side of the barrel just forward of the rear sight.  Just above that is stamped Browning Arms Company Morgan Utah & Montreal PQ.  The serial number is engraved on the lower left side of the receiver at the rear.  The visible proof marks are on the left side of the barrel near the receiver.  Browning S.A. is stamped on the right side of the barrel just forward of the rear sight.   Just above that is stamped PATS: U.S. 5,571,101   EUROP. 0692696  BPR Caliber 30-06 Spg. Only (for 30-06‘s).

I have seen no indication or claims of BPR or Dualis production by Miroku in Japan. 

I have not been able to examine a Dualis in person to verify its markings, but I think we can safely assume it is the same or nearly the same as the BPR.  The Dualis’ markings may be stamped in different languages due to its intended international market.

The basics of my research and a few related articles that I have found indicate that Browning developed the center fire pump rifle (BPR) in an effort to keep their share of the firearms (hunting/recreational) market, should semi auto rifles become illegal to possess in the Untied States.  Some misinformed people where trying to use the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (Sept. 13, 1994) to make it illegal to own any semi auto rifle, for any purpose.  The ban expired by Sunset Law in 2004.

The Browning family did make firearms in the United States in the 1800’s, but just for the sake of being complete with this article, no Browning named commercial firearms (as we know them today) have been produced/manufactured in the U. S.  There have been some prototypes designed and developed here, but not any commercial production by the Browning name.   Some other U.S. firearms companies have produced their own licensed versions of Browning owned designs/patents, but they were produced under that companies own name, usually with a different model name/number.

Browning’s have mostly been manufactured in Belgium (Fabrique National) since the early 1900’s.  Miroku of Japan has produced/manufactured some Browning named firearms since the early 1970’s.

BPR Serial Numbers

You can visit Browning's website - to determine the year of production of your rifle


Just like with the BLR’s, I can tell you that the website is absolutely wrong with the serial numbers, as far as the order goes.

The website states:

In 1975 Browning started using two digits for the date of manufacture:

The first part of the serial number identification is supposed to begin with the actual serial number, such as 1000.
The coded year of manufacture is supposed to be next as in - NR - followed by:
1E7 (Model Number) = Browning BPR Pump Rifle
Example:1001NR1E7  = A 1997 BPR Pump Rifle with a serial number of 1001.

Actually, it is the reverse:

A true example is: 1E7NR1001 = A 1997 BPR with a serial number of 1001

The model designator comes first, then the coded year of manufacture, then the serial number. 

The next mistake that appears is the supposed 1998 change to the serial number standardization system that was required to work in their Oracle program.  This meant a new system including a Model Number change was supposed to have taken effect in 1998 models.  My research and the 1998 BPR year models that I have seen do not support this.  All of the 1998 year model BPR’s I have been able to locate still use the same system as listed above for 1997 year models, only with the coded year of NP (1998).

A true example is: 1E7NP1001 = A 1998 BPR with a serial number of 1001.

Now for the supposed 1998 change, which apparently did not take effect until 1999.  Note: I have not been able to find a 1999 BPR to verify the change.

The website states:

In 1998:
The first part of the serial number identification is supposed to begin with the actual serial number, such as 1000.
The coded year of manufacture is supposed to be next as in - NP - followed by:
321 (Model Number) = Browning BPR Pump Rifle
Example:1001NP321  = A 1998 BPR Pump Rifle with a serial number of 1001.

Again, it is the reverse:

A true example is: 321NP1001 = A 1998 BPR with a serial number of 1001

The model designator comes first, then the coded year of manufacture, then the serial number.

Just like with the BLR’s, this one mistake will cause some buyers/sellers/ collectors a little problem, but you can trust me - they (Browning) have it wrong on their website!

Just for your information, I have seen references that state that Browning started each year’s serial number sequence at the number 1000 for all models.  I think that information is correct, and if so, the above BPR serial number would indicate that it was actually the first BPR produced in 1998.

You should print the Browning “date gun” link I have provided above, because with anything on the internet, it may disappear one day.   However, you can just use the corrected information I have provided with this following information to help you correctly date the year of manufacture of BPR’s.

1E7 = BPR Model Number for 1997 and 1998
321 = BPR Model Number for 1999, 2000 and 2001
NR = Coded Year of Manufacture 1997
NP = Coded Year of Manufacture 1998
NN = Coded Year of Manufacture 1999
MM = Coded Year of Manufacture 2000
MZ = Coded Year of Manufacture 2001

Dualis Serial Numbers

I have not been able to find any information on the serial numbering system for the Dualis.  Browning International’s web site does not offer the same in depth resources as the Browning North America web site.

I can only assume that since both are made by FN, they should probably be the same, but that is only an assumption.

Browning Center Fire Pump Rifle Models

BPR

In my previous BLR article I made a big statement.  I like BLR’s - a lot.  But I really like the BPR’s in the center fire calibers, especially the 30-06.  Actually, that combination has now become my favorite.  While I have not been into the BPR’s but a few years, I still plan to acquire every BPR in 30-06 that I come across.  If  I have the funds and it is reasonably priced of course.

The BPR Pump Rifle was introduced in 1997 and they were produced through 2001.  Some sources state they were not produced in 2001, but I have seen properly serial numbered BPR’s (year code MZ) for the year 2001.  I will note that BPR’s were listed in the year 2000 Browning catalog, but apparently not in the year 2001 catalog.  I can not explain why they were not in that catalog.

I have read one source that states the Browning Dualis (see Dualis information below) was supposed to have replaced the BPR for American sales in 2001, but I have seen no evidence that the Dualis has ever been sold or advertised for sale in the United States.

1997
BPR (Browning Pump Rifle) in long and short action. Four calibers in long action .270, 30-06, 7mm Rem. Mag., 300 Win. Mag., and two in short action in 243 and 308.  The two regular long action and two short action barrels are 22” long.  The magnum barrels are 24” long.  BPR barrels are free floated and the rifles weigh around 7 ½ pounds.

The BPR uses the same scope mounts as BAR MK II’s and later BLR’s.  The BPR uses the same magazines as BAR MK II’s.  The BPR’s magazine capacity is four rounds for standard calibers and three rounds for magnum calibers.  The safety on the BPR is reversible for left hand operation.

The BPR was dropped from the line only 5 years (2001) of production.  

The BPR has an aluminum alloy receiver.

The trigger group assembly is held into the receiver by two steel pins which can easily be driven out, allowing the removal of the trigger group.

The single stage trigger is gold and the Gold Browning logo can be found on the bottom of the trigger guard.

The front sight is a ramp mounted brass bead with a sight hood.

The rear sight is click adjustable for both elevation and windage.  It is attached to the barrel by two screws.

The action release is a lever located on the lower right side of the receiver, just forward of the middle of the trigger guard

The wooden walnut forearm (checkered) is held to the two action (slide) bars by one single screw.  Do not replace the screw with a front swivel assembly.  Inside the front of the forearm are two small felt pads about the size of a dime.  I have seen reports were that their intended use is to clean the action bars or barrel.  That is not the case.  They are a barrier (buffer) between the wood and action bars, used to keep the two apart.

If you want a front swivel assembly, you have to use the type that goes around the barrel itself.

The wooden walnut stock (checkered) is a pistol grip type.  It has a black rubber butt plate, held to the stock by two screws.  The stock is held to the receiver by one screw headed bolt that is accessed by removing the butt plate.  The stock has a swivel assembly factory installed.

Neither the stock nor forearm has any protective finish on the inside.  I recommend a good interior coat of something like boiled linseed oil.  I use a regular silicon spray on the exterior of the wood.

The magazine floor plate is released by a sliding latch located just in front of the trigger guard.  The magazine can be removed from the floor plate assembly by slight hand pressure.

The bolt is a seven lug rotary type which locks directly into the barrel.  The barrel and receiver are intended to be replaced (if needed) as one unit.

BPR Owners Manual


Here is a link to the NRA Museum 1998 Dope Bag article concerning their introduction of the BPR.


Dualis

This is basically a European BPR variation.  The mechanism, manual safety, and magazine catch are all identical except for some cosmetic differences. The operation is also identical, including the unusual pump action pattern. The standard barrel is 20 inches, but the same barrel is used for magnum rounds and is therefore shorter than the barrel used on magnum BPR rifles. The Dualis has a Express type sighting rib that also has a folding leaf sight; this rib can be removed, revealing drilling and tapping for a telescopic sight. The front sight has a bead of fluorescent plastic and no sight hood. The receiver housing is made from light alloy, but other metal parts are of high-strength steel. The stock and fore-end are of walnut; the pistol grip of the stock is unusually deep and is checkered. There are reports that the Dualis only has a magazine capacity of two rounds to satisfy European requirements, but they all have the same magazine capacity as USA model BPR’s.  The Dualis was introduced in Europe is 2001.  There are unconfirmed reports that it started being sold in North America in 2003.  Note: I have not found the Dualis was ever available in the United States.  If you find one in in the U.S (especially in 30-06) I would greatly appreciate the information.

The general information given for the BPR is the same for the Dualis, except where noted.

The Dualis was offered in the following calibers:  .308, 270, 30-06, 7mm Rem. And 300 WM.

All the calibers of the Dualis have a 20” barrel.

It has a folding leaf rear sight mounted on a removal rear sight rib.  It is drilled and tapped for a scope also.

It has a fluorescent plastic front sight on a ramp, w/o a sight hood.

The stock and forearm are walnut and are checkered.  They both have a different (European style) design.

Dualis Owners Manual


BPR Standards

As a standard, the short action and regular long action BPR’s have a 22” barrel and the magnums have a 24” barrel.  All Dualis barrels are 20”.

Below is an example BPR specification for the 30-06:

Specifications and features:
Browning BPR Center Fire Pump Rifle
.30-06 Springfield caliber
22" six groove button-rifled barrel
1:10" RH twist
4 Round detachable box magazine
Pump action
Single Stage Trigger
7 lug (three rows) breech bolt
Recessed bolt face
Rotating bolt
Side ejection
Gold bead raised ramp front sight/ w a sight hood
Click adjustable rear sight
Lightweight aluminum receiver
Checkered walnut stock
Checkered walnut forearm
Crowned muzzle
Hinged floor plate, detachable box magazine
Recoil pad
5-1/4 lbs. trigger pull
13-5/8" length of pull
19-3/4" sight radius
1-1/4" drop at comb
1-1/2" drop at heel
39 5/8“" overall length
7 lbs. 3 oz.

The difference in receiver length between short actions and long actions appears to be about ¾”.

Repairs

My research shows that Browning depends on a natural product called Kanabe to coat its stocks, but that is not verified.  Citristrip has been reported as one of the better ways to remove the Browning epoxy type finish.  For minor repairs on the polyurethane finished Browning stocks, try Lemon Pledge or something similar.  I have not found a source for aftermarket stocks.  See below for information on factory replacement stocks from Midwest Gun Works (MGW).

If you ever have the stock and forearm off, I highly recommend that you apply a good coat of wood oil to the interior of both.  There is no finish on the inside.  If you want to strip and refinish the stock, here is a link to a process that results in a beautiful finish.  http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2702095.  It is the third post down and make sure you take heed of the checkered area warnings.

I have not found any information on any gunsmiths who do trigger work on the BPR other than MGW.  I would assume any that work on the BAR could work on the BPR.

Besides the information on Browning’s website concerning repairs and parts, I have found that Midwest Gun Works (MGW) seems to be the best source for getting what you need.  http://www.midwestgunworks.com.  They also have a good selection of parts and  diagrams. 

and some parts also. 

I have not found a Browning Field Service Manual for the BPR.  I have also not found any detailed assembly/disassembly instructions for it.  Personally, I have not found it to be difficult to disassemble or reassemble.  It is very much like the BAR.  Just pay attention to the parts relationship if you choose to have a go at it.

Commemoratives - Specials

None are known to exist.


Caliber Interchangeable Magazines

JFYI some of the BPR magazines (long vs. short action specific) are interchangeable.  Many are marked as being multiple caliber.

They are the same as BAR MK II magazines.

.243 & 308 interchange - four round

270 & 30-06 interchange - four round

7mm - three round

300 WM - three round

The Dualis magazine holds four standard rounds and three magnum rounds.  It is assumed that they also offer some interchangeability.

Conclusion

I will conclude this article by saying that the research into the BPR/Dualis has been very challenging and educational.  I hope I got everything right and I really strived to verify any information that has been presented.

I would ask that if you find any new information or conflicting information, that you contact me through the PumpRifle site and let me have an opportunity to review your sources and make additions or corrections as needed.

Sunday, August 07, 2011

First silhouette match...

Dead-eye Dick making a "run" of 7 chickens...
Well, I'd say I was humbled but considering I didn't ever get the chance to properly prepare for the match I'm not that disappointed.  Oh, I didn't do so well at first, only getting 2 chickens on the first bank but cleaned the second.  However, things went down hill from there.  I had no idea where to hold on any of the other targets because I didn't get to try the gun and ammo combination prior to the match.  I had a rough zero.  I did manage to get a turkey and a couple of rams.  One ram was hit in the base knocking it backwards from under the target and making the ram fall forward of the stand.  A little bit of drop there.  But not being properly zeroed was the least of my problems.  I was pretty darn shaky today.  I need practice!

Practice has been a big problem for me the past few years.  I need time to go to the range to practice.  Nana seems to think that my time is her time.  We'll have to make adjustments so that I have time to practice.  With practice I can be better.  Nana even mentioned that was so. 

I used my Thompson Center Arms Contender with 21" .22 LR Match barrel, a Norinco scope (since removed), and 1980s vintage Winchester high velocity 40 gr. round nose ammo.  

P.S. I guess I didn't say that I got 15 out of 40!  I can shoot better but I did not. 

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Making sense of Remington System rifles...

The Remington System, popularly known as the Rolling Block or "roller" for short, was once an extremely popular military and civilian single-shot rifle action. Recently, a young fellow brought me a rifle his family had taken in lieu of cash for work performed. As I looked at it it was a #4 Remington rifle, 80-85% with octagonal barrel caliber .32 rimfire. It was missing the front sight blade but otherwise could have been shot (if ammo was available). After some further research (after seeing the rifle) I was going to call him to let him know that he should value it at about $450. However, before I could call he called me.


What did he have to say? He had been looking on-line and thought that the screws (?) didn't look right for it to be a #4.  Before I talked to him again I wanted to do some more research so that I could either convince him that it was a #4 or give him a correct identification.  Then I thought that I'd just record my notes here...


The Remington system began with the Geiger split breech rifle about 1865. Too, late for the American Civil War the gun was further developed with an eye to overseas sales, mainly Europe and South America with additional civilian/sporting sales.


One thing that one discovers right from the get go is that there are within the broader categorizations even to models as sold by contract to various military organizations is that there are numerous variations (not different models) as Remington used up parts from other contracts or redirected other contracts which hadn't been paid for to newer clients/contracts. Remington did what other companies did at the time and that is they used intensive management oversight to maximize profits by way of minimizing waste. The used and reused parts as much as possible. Again, variations within variations within models within contracts...


So what actions were there?  Well, it seems that somebody has assigned numbers to the rolling block actions, 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 (actually a falling block).

Remington #1 Rolling Block .43 Carbine, centerfire

The #1 Remington rolling block rifle is also known as the black powder cartridge rifle. Produced by Remington in both military and civilian models from 1866 to 1895 these large frame rolling block production  totaled well over 1 million rifles with a number of variations. 1.250" wide this is the largest of the Remington system actions.  This same action was also used on the 1-1/2 rifle.

No. 1-1/2 Action rifle, rimfire


The #2 Remington rolling block is a smaller scale civilian model sporting rifle using a receiver patterned after the 1871 Army pistol. A number of the parts are interchangeable with the 1871, 1891 and 1902 pistols as well as the #7 target rifle. This rifle was produced in a wide variety of  rim fire and center fire cartridges. The rim fire models with bar extractors are the most numerous.  1.125" wide it was used for smaller and less "powerful" cartridges than the #1 action.  It can be identified by the curved counter at the rear where it joins the stock.  

The #3 was actually a falling block action, the Remington-Hepburn.  

No. 4 rifle, for .22S, .22L, .22LR, .25 Stevens ("25-10"), .32S, .32L rimfires
The #4 Remington rolling block is the smallest of the rolling block rifles it is at once noticeably smaller if you've ever seen one of the larger actions. It was only produced in rim fire cartridges and may be found in the three variations shown here plus military and Boy Scout models. The quickest identifying feature is the mounting of Breech Block and Hammer on screws rather than pins. Early production #4s have tapered octagon barrels while the late takedown model was produced with a round barrel.

Model 1897 7x57mm Mauser Chambering, the #5

The #5 Remington rolling block rifles are also known as the smokeless powder cartridge rolling block rifles. Beginning production in 1896 they comprise the 1897, 1902, and 1910 models. While the #5 was produced in several smokeless center fire cartridges the vast majority of them are chambered 7mm Mauser.


No. 6 Rifle (a falling block), for small caliber rimfires such as the .22 LR
The #6 is not a true rolling block. It is a small scale falling block boys rifle. 

Thursday, March 24, 2011

M1 Carbine Stuff...

Correct M1 Carbine Gas Piston
Interesting thing I ran into today. A fellow had an M1 Carbine (not the rifle) that had been "converted to manual action". He wanted it converted back to semi-auto. It had the original gas piston nut and we couldn't, at first, get the gas piston out of the gun. A little soak in Kroil worked wonders and what we discovered was that the original gas piston had been replaced with one of the units from S&K. I'm not a huge M1 Carbine fan, and haven't ever owned one nor did I have to work with or on them while in the service. So, I learned a lot today.

It will be an easy fix. All that is needed is the correct gas piston and the gun should operate as intended.

Now, why did somebody do this? Well the owner said it was to comply with New Jersey law but I've been told that New Jersey law does NOT prohibit semi-automatic rifles. We thought perhaps it was to comply with a hunting regulation such as those in Pennsylvania which don't allow semi-auto firearms. We just don't know why this particular gun was altered.

1969 Ad for the Gas Piston Dummy
Why, you're probably asking yourself, did/do some states prohibit semi-automatic firearms for hunting? I believe it was a misguided attempt to cut the "game hogs" off at the knees and to prevent one shooter from killing all the deer a large hunting party might be licensed to kill. In other words, it was intended to reduce deer kills. I don't know why it might still be in effect, but old "traditions" die hard.

Monday, February 28, 2011

A Rifle to Full-fill Your Civic Duty?

You might or might not see the connections between my last few articles.  I'll leave it up to the reader to draw conclusions as to my point(s).

Back in 1999 there was much consternation over the Y2K event and anticipated difficulties that would accompany computer failures cascading around the world. Even before this, there were people who had coined an acronym for such events, TEOTWAWKI or The End Of The World As We Know It. But they weren't the first, various religious groups have long fore-told of the end of the world, the apocalypse, and today there are those who use the Mayan calendar and Nostradamus in an attempt to convince that the end times will come on December 21, 2012. Of course one can simply look at the news from the middle east with the people in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, and Libya as well as our own states of California, Wisconsin and Indiana to see a trend to unrest and civil upheaval. Such things give one pause, at the least, and make the wise person consider preparations to avoid problems if such things happen in their area.

What preparations? Well, certainly it depends on what you believe will happen but there are some very basic things one can do that aren't outrageous and can be useful even if nothing happens. Ensuring one has enough food for 2-3 months on hand, that one can purify water, that one can generate electricity and/or have light at night if the electricity is cut off, that there is at least some extra fuel for vehicles and some medical supplies on hand (for treatment of injuries and continuing medicinal care) are all important and things we should do in the event of natural disasters. I'm not going to address those here. I'm going to talk about something else that one should do and that is having the means to defend oneself and protect one's other preparations.

I would even submit that self-defense (including the defense of one's family) is a civic duty. At the least it will free police and National Guard responders to deal with other things which helps the entire community. It is codified in the militia laws for those men aged 16-55 (although the ages may differ state-to-state). Certainly, one should live up to one's responsibility to one's own family (and friends) and self-defense demands the appropriate tool.

I know that there are those who will advocate the shotgun and/or handgun for this purpose as they do now for self-defense in the home or concealed carry. Unfortunately the effective range of the shotgun is insufficient for the single user and most people using a handgun are simply going to be out-gunned by any attacker outside their home using anything else due to their inability to hit targets at greater than armed robbery distances. I'm sure there are exceptions and I feel the shotgun and handgun are excellent for certain applications. However, I think that the single firearm, where only one will be used, for this application is the rifle. What rifle? Now that might be a conundrum...

One characteristic of such a rifle is that it should be chambered for a common cartridge. I further submit that it should be a cartridge common in the midst of such a circumstance. Some cartridges might always be stocked by the local gun store but did you know that FEMA and standard police policy is to secure your local gun store in the event of extreme civil unrest? You're just not going to be able to run out and buy a couple extra boxes of .243 Winchester and such. What I'm talking about is what you can store up quite a bit of or easily find "on the street" in such a circumstance.

Certainly, the most common cartridge is the .22 LR but some people won't have confidence in it even though the Israeli Defense Force has actually used it to eliminate riot agitators. One can store quite a large stock of .22 LR in a small space and it is easily moved if that becomes necessary. It is likely that your neighbors might have a box or two (50-100 rounds) in a drawer some place and it might be possible that a looter driven off might drop a box or two that you could recover. What other cartridges might we consider?

Well, number two would have to be the .223 Remington or 5.56mm NATO. Police use it, the National Guard and all other military organizations use it and it is tremendously popular among younger shooters. It will be everywhere. It is cheap enough that you can stock a realistic quantity at relatively low cost and certainly other people will do so. It is VERY likely to be available at any given place during such an emergency.

What else is out there? For pistol cartridges available in carbines both the 9mm NATO (Luger) and .40 S&W are used by the military and police. Other rifle cartridges used certainly include the .308 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO (used in police counter-sniper rifles and military medium/GP machine-guns). You might even count the .30-06 due to the wide distribution of M1 Garand rifles and CMP ammunition. Certainly there are going to be regional differences. E.g. in some localities the .30-30 (.30 WCF) is ubiquitous and a rifle chambered for it might be a reasonable choice. In any case reason/logic must be applied to the choice as there is no room for sentiment or nostalgia. This is an important decision as it will determine what rifle is used.

So the next question is, what rifle to use? The first requirement is most certainly that it be a repeater. Let's face it, a single-shot requires an extremely high-level skill set on the part of the user and that for use against the average group. Just about any single user would be overcome by a group of any size or higher than average skill level. Remember, this isn't about being fair or nice, it is about winning, it is about survival. So what sort of repeater?

A bolt action is simple and usually robust. Unfortunately the magazine capacity of 4-5 rounds is usually not sufficient and non-military surplus arms lack any method for rapid reloading. One nearly ideal bolt action gun is the British #4 or SMLE rifles. Unfortunately acquiring their ammunition might be problematic. There are usable .223 rifles but they might better be used in the counter-sniper role than as general defensive weapons.

The lever action really only applies to such as the .30-30 or rimmed pistol cartridges such as the .357 Magnum and .44 Remington Magnum. If you have one it could be useful but if you have to start from scratch for this purpose they might not be best choice, again due to ammunition availability. Properly managed they can be very effective in defending against groups of "bandits". There are some chambered for the .22 LR and .308 Winchester but none chambered for the other choices and the cost of some of those rifles is right up there with any AR system rifle.

As an aside, there is only one pump action rifle with detachable magazine for the .223/5.56mm cartridge and that is made by Remington. In some localities it might be necessary to buy this action type but there is a reason that there is only one such made and sold in the USofA.

The truth is that the standard for modern self-defense rifles is a semi-automatic such as the AR15 type. It is a huge advantage for most people both in terms of trigger control and delivering repeat fire to have a semi-automatic firearm. Choosing an AR15 type rifle provides the added benefits of interchangeable magazines on a proven system designed for the .223/5.56mm cartridge. One can get interchangeable uppers for other cartridges for other uses but those would be a secondary use. We're talking about the primary purpose of which is self-defense.

Other reasonable semi-auto options would include the Ruger Mini-14s, the M-14 such as the Springfield Armory rifles and carbines and the M1 Garand. The reason to get any of these isn't price or interchangeability of magazines (clips for the Garand) but for reasons of availability, familiarity (thus avoiding additional training time) or a need for greater range (the .308 and .30-06 will greatly outrange the .223/5.56mm cartridge). Rural folks may have or feel there is a real need for the latter.

So, we have a rather truncated discussion of the subject, for the moment, but it comes down to this, an AR15 type rifle in .223/5.56mm is my choice. It will shoot bullets from 55 to 77 gr. and uses any readily available military or police ammo in the standard magazines (if that should become necessary). It is light, compact (telescoping stock and 16-1/4" barrel). It will do for me.